Power Politics and the Takeover of Holistic Health in North America: An Exploratory Historical Analysis
نویسنده
چکیده
As far back as recorded history goes, indigenous peoples have practiced holistic systems of medicine. Their complex and sophisticated systems of medicine were effective health promotion, disease prevention, treatment, and palliative care. Indigenous systems of medicine reflected cosmologies that were deeply rooted in interconnectedness between: Earth and all inhabitants; mind, body, spirit; all life forms in the universe. Indigenous systems of medicine are the world’s oldest surviving medical traditions. Another old system of medicine, homeopathy, is practiced in the modern day and was brought here as part of the settler wave of migration. Homeopathic concepts share a great deal with indigenous cosmologies and medical world views. For example, the notion that spirit or energy is responsible for creating health is common to both; homeopaths call this “vital force” and various words exist in the myriad languages of the original stewards of this land. Both of these systems of medicine have helped to keep communities healthy throughout history, but, like all systems of medicine, they also have their problems. Historically, Europeans had two major impacts on indigenous systems of medicine. First, genocide of indigenous peoples — using techniques such as warfare, the introduction of alcohol, residential schools, spreading diseases — causing the death of millions of people and the destruction of their 1. The author would like to thank research assistants Aliya Amarshi and Sundeep Dhaliwal for their assistance in the literature review, citations and copy editing of this manuscript. Contact: farah. [email protected]; ph (604) 682-3269 ext 6169 130 © Pimatisiwin: A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health 9(1) 2011 systems of health care (although some survived) and second, the introduction of holistic systems of health care. Allopathic medicine, while it is well entrenched in North America, has only held this influential position for approximately one century. Dispelling myths that allopathic dominance was gained exclusively through evidence based health outcomes using scientific diagnostic and treatment protocols, this paper demonstrates that two systems of healthcare were overturned in North America, using primarily financial, military, and political tools. In analyzing these social forces, this paper is in no way a wholesale critique of allopathy. Indeed, allopathy has tremendous value in improving population health, particularly in acute and emergency care. Holistic systems of medicine were ascendant in the past and their decline was less about “the progress of science” and more about power and politics. Despite this decline, holistic health is re-emerging. Medical pluralism is experiencing a renaissance.
منابع مشابه
Politics and Power in Global Health: The Constituting Role of Conflicts; Comment on “Navigating Between Stealth Advocacy and Unconscious Dogmatism: The Challenge of Researching the Norms, Politics and Power of Global Health”
In a recent article, Gorik Ooms has drawn attention to the normative underpinnings of the politics of global health. We claim that Ooms is indirectly submitting to a liberal conception of politics by framing the politics of global health as a question of individual morality. Drawing on the theoretical works of Chantal Mouffe, we introduce a conflictual concept of the political as an alternative...
متن کاملImproving Immunization Rates of Underserved Children: A Historical Study of 10 Health Departments
Background Despite high immunization rates, hundreds of thousands of poor and underserved children continue to lack their necessary immunizations and are at risk of acquiring a vaccine-preventable disease. Local Health Departments (LHDs) and public health clinicians figure prominently in efforts to address this problem. Methods This exploratory research compared ten (10) North Carolina LHDs w...
متن کاملPower and Priorities: The Growing Pains of Global Health; Comment on “Knowledge, Moral Claims and the Exercise of Power in Global Health”
Shiffman has argued that some actors have a great deal of power in global health, and that more reflection is needed on whether such forms of power are legitimate. Global health is a new and evolving field that builds upon the historical fields of public and international health, but is more multi-disciplinary and inter-disciplinary in nature. This article argues that the distribution of power ...
متن کاملThe Politics of Researching Global Health Politics; Comment on “Knowledge, Moral Claims and the Exercise of Power in Global Health”
In this comment, I build on Shiffman’s call for the global health community to more deeply investigate structural and productive power. I highlight two challenges we must grapple with as social scientists carrying out the types of investigation that Shiffman proposes: the politics of challenging the powerful; and the need to investigate types of expertise that have traditionally been thought o...
متن کامل